Monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline Solar Panels – What’s the Difference?


Hi, I’m Amy at the altE Store.
We are often asked what the difference is between monocrystalline and polycrystalline
solar panels, so we thought we’d show you. You can see here I have two solar panels made by the same manufacturer, SolarWorld. This one is monocrystalline, and this one is polycrystalline. A couple of things stand out right away with their appearance. This is due to how solar cells, or the individual squares are made. The monocrystalline panel is a consistent
black or very very dark blue color. It is cut into wafers from a conical silicon ingot that’s grown in a lab. To make the ingot the silicon rocks are melted at 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and then
a seed crystal is lowered into the melted slush, and slowly pulled up while rotating.
It’s almost like making a hand dipped candle, but instead of melting wax, you are melting
rocks. Because of the round shape, there is a lot
of material wasted as they cut it into the required square shape.
That’s why they usually have rounded corners, to help minimize the waste.
If you look at older solar panels, they actually made them with round cells.
Here’s a picture of an old Arco solar panel from at least 30 years ago, it still works, for the record. Polycrystalline cells are made a different way.
They load about 1300 pounds of silicon rocks into a 3 foot by 3 foot quartz mold to create
a square shape, and then load it into a 2500 degree Fahrenheit furnace. It takes 20 hours to melt, and about 3 days
to cool down. The polycrystalline panel has a blue mottled look,
like a piece of particle board, it looks like it is made up of multiple pieces of silicon
pressed together. That is actually caused from when the melted
silicon cools and hardens, it crystallizes, like frost on a window.
When it is sawn into the wafers, there much less wasted material from the square ingot than from the round monocrystalline ingot, and is a less expensive manufacturing process.
Due to the higher cost of manufacturing, monocrystalline panels tend to be a little more expensive than polycrystalline panels. Although efficiencies in manufacturing processes are really reducing the cost difference.
OK, so monocrystalline panels look different and cost a little bit more than polycrystalline. But the big question is, is it worth worrying about the difference? To help answer that, let’s talk about
performance differences. Monocrystalline solar panels tend to be more
efficient than polycrystalline solar panels. Let’s say on average about 17.5% vs.15.5%
module efficiency. So they are 2% more efficient. What does that
really mean? It means that you can have slightly more power in the same amount of space with
monocrystalline than polycrystalline. Let’s look at the two panels I have again. They are both the same size, about 38″ x 66″. The monocrystalline panel outputs 270 watts, and
the polycrystalline puts out 260 watts. If I were to build a system with 20 monocrystalline
panels, I’d get 5400 watts. To do a similar system with 260W polycrystalline panels, I’d need to use one more panel for 21 panels to get 5460 watts. That would mean a little bit more space, a little more racking, and if using microinverters or DC Optimizers, more equipment needed. So while the cost of
the solar panels may be less for polycrystalline, the overall system cost may be the same when you take the extra equipment into account. One performance difference is how they react to temperature. Monocrystalline panels handle the heat slightly better than polycrystalline. How slight is slight? Comparing the temperature coefficient of the two types shows us that
monocrystalline short circuit current drops 0.04% for every
degree kelvin over standard test conditions of 25 degrees Celsius, or 77 degrees Fahrenheit. So if it is 20 degrees hotter on the roof
than in the test suite, which is highly likely in the summer,
the monocrystalline solar panel can lose .06 amps out of a rated 8 amps.
For polycrystalline, it loses 0.051%. That equals losing .08 amps.
So the difference is two one hundredths of an amp. In extreme desert conditions, the difference may be big enough to matter,
but for most residential environments, the difference is quite small.
Finally, monocrystalline panels tend to behave a little better in less than perfect light
conditions. No solar panel, regardless of their type,
performs well in the shade. Period. But, if you have slight shading issues, or
tend to have hazy skies, monocrystalline panels may perform a little better.
However, with the availability of microinverters and DC optimizers maximizing each panel in
the solar array, the difference may not be noticeable. Or if you’ve located your solar array so that there are no shading issues, there’s no difference at all. So as you can see, the differences between monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels
is not as dramatic as it once was. Advances in technology have made them practically
interchangeable. So your choice of which crystalline technology to use may simply come down to color preference or space constraints. I’m Amy at the altE Store. Check out more
of our videos, and go to our website at altEStore.com, where we are making renewable doable.

100 Comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *